Old-Earth Creationism

Old-Earth Creationism

Professional, peer-reviewed papers addressing the biblical and theological teaching on the age of the earth.

The Monument Fold, Central Grand Canyon, Arizona

The Monument Fold, Central Grand Canyon, Arizona

Dr. Andrew A. Snelling • Aug. 9, 2023

Because the Tapeats Sandstone beds were still relatively unlithified and soft less than a year after rapid burial, they easily responded to soft-sediment deformation.

Scriptural Geology, Then and Now

Scriptural Geology, Then and Now

Warren H. Johns • Nov. 30, 2016

The place of the biblical Flood in the geological record remains one of the most hotly debated issues among creationist geologists today.

Did Death of Any Kind Exist Before the Fall?

Did Death of Any Kind Exist Before the Fall?

Simon Turpin • April 3, 2013

Death, whether animal or human, physical or spiritual, is a consequence of man’s disobedience toward his Creator and an intrusion into His “very good” creation.

Untangling Uniformitarianism

Untangling Uniformitarianism

Dr. John K. Reed • March 17, 2010

Of the nine terms associated with uniformitarianism, seven can be replaced or eliminated, which refutes the accusation that diluvialists do not understand uniformitarianism.

Old-Earth Creationism on Answers Research Journal

Undergirded by uniformitarian assumptions, the concept of the earth being millions of years old became popular in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries, and it soon permeated burgeoning scientific disciplines like geology and biology. Before long, some Christians sought to incorporate these vast ages into Scripture.

Due to the genealogies connecting Adam to Jesus, these individuals realized the impossibility of inserting deep time after Adam; therefore, they searched the Bible’s first chapter to find ways to harmonize billions of years with the inspired text. In 1804, Thomas Chalmers proposed that a gap of indeterminate duration could be inserted between the first two verses of Genesis. Chalmers’ novel idea, known as the gap theory, opened the floodgates to other reinterpretations of Genesis 1. Over the past two centuries, Christian leaders have promoted numerous harmonistic views, including the day-age theory, progressive creation, the framework hypothesis, historic creation, etc.

Each of the harmonistic views reinterprets the plain, historically recognized meaning of Genesis 1 while also creating irreconcilable differences with the remainder of Scripture. For example, every old-earth creationist view necessarily places millions of years of bloodshed, suffering, disease, and death prior to Adam’s sin, yet the Bible is clear that these tragedies are a consequence of Adam’s rebellion. Furthermore, if Adam’s sin did not bring physical death into the world, then the solution to sin—Christ’s physical death and bodily resurrection—makes no sense.

These peer-reviewed articles will address the various biblical and theological issues related to the age of the earth. They will also defend that Scripture clearly teaches a young earth and global Flood, as opposed to all efforts to harmonize the Bible with the uniformitarian philosophy that rejects the biblical accounts of creation and the Flood.


ISSN: 1937-9056 Copyright © Answers in Genesis, Inc.