To the Ark, and Back Again? Using the Marsupial Fossil Record to Investigate the Post-Flood Boundary

pp. 1–22 • Chad Arment

There is no debate as contentious as the post-Flood boundary issue within creation science.

Young-Earth Y Chromosome Clocks Confirm Known Post-Columbian Amerindian Population History and Suggest Pre-Columbian Population Replacement in the Americas

pp. 23–33 • Dr. Nathaniel T. Jeanson

Recent human history represents a novel arena in which to comparatively test evolution and young-earth creation (YEC) against each other.

Darwin’s Views of Women Had a Considerable Effect on Society

pp. 35–39 • Dr. Jerry Bergman

This review has two goals, to document from Darwin’s writings that he believed women were inferior to men, and to document that his views greatly influenced modern academia and evolutionists.

Rameses III and Tel Lachish—A Test Case For the Egyptian Chronology of David Down

pp. 41–67 • Gregory Iocco

Remains at Tel Lachish show a stratigraphy that discredits Velikovsky’s theory concerning Rameses III and invalidates the framework of Down’s revised Egyptian chronology.

Heat Problems Associated with Genesis Flood Models—Part 3: Vapour Canopy Models

pp. 69–94 • William Worraker

The biblical and scientific arguments for a pre-Flood vapour canopy do not support the theory.

Effects of the Fall on the Physical Creation: A Biblical Analysis

pp. 95–111 • Zachary Klein , et. al.

To interpret the natural world through the lens of Scripture, one must have a correct understanding of the Fall and its effects on the physical creation.

The Firmament: What Did God Create on Day 2?

pp. 113–133 • Dr. Terry Mortenson

Considerable disagreement exists in the church about what God made on the second day of Creation Week in Genesis 1.

It’s for the Birds: Avian Fine-Tuning of Flood Chronology

pp. 135–152 • Dr. Steven W. Boyd

Genesis 8:5–13 reveals the character of Noah and delimits the time of the water’s becoming powerful to between 16 and 23 days after the Flood began.

Remembering Spillover Erosion of Grand Canyon

pp. 153–188 • Dr. Steve Austin , et. al.

We should remember an important fact—creationist and evolutionist thinking about spillover continues to make a significant contribution to our understanding of erosion of Grand Canyon.

Inerrancy and Biblical Authority: How and Why Old-Earth Inerrantists Are Unintentionally Undermining Inerrancy

pp. 189–219 • Dr. Terry Mortenson

The old-earth signers of the CSBInerrancy unintentionally violated their own principles of interpretation and unintentionally undermined the inerrancy and the authority of Scripture.

Louis Agassiz and Alexander Winchell: Two Case Histories of Creationists Who Illustrate That Rejecting Genesis Influences the Acceptance of Racism

pp. 221–229 • Dr. Jerry Bergman

Theories that attempted to harmonize evolution and the Scriptures gave birth to, and perpetuated, a form of scientific racism based on Darwinism.

The Mesopotamian Deluge Accounts: Neither History Nor Revelation

pp. 231–240 • Jason W. Landless

The deluge poems of Mesopotamia are soaked in a moral and theological framework that is not just different from Genesis but utterly hostile to it.

Implications of Creation Biology for a Neogene-Quaternary Flood/Post-Flood Boundary

pp. 241–257 • Chad Arment

While several current Flood models posit an Upper Cenozoic Flood Boundary, none of them address the problem of biblical kinds and their relationship Genesis.

The Grand Canyon, Monument to an Ancient Earth: The Deceptions Continue

pp. 257–325 • Dr. Terry Mortenson

The Grand Canyon, Monument to Ancient Earth? rejects the truth of Genesis regarding the Flood and the age of the earth.

Gypsies Massacred as Part of the Darwinian Eugenic Holocaust

pp. 325–331 • Dr. Jerry Bergman

Attempts to apply Darwinian eugenics were part of the Nazi effort to produce a superior race in Germany.

The Failed Attempt to Prove Jewish Inferiority by a Skeleton Collection

pp. 331–337 • Dr. Jerry Bergman

Over 100 innocent people were murdered to prove a theory that turned out to be not only wrong but based on an erroneous secular philosophy, namely Darwinism.

• Volumes